The Lucy Pinder Thread

[Poggy]

Sorry they are late. Yesterday's Daily Star...

[Poggy]

Saturday's page 3 picture in the Daily Star...



And just to show what photoshop can do. Here is the original one in smaller, higher quality and without any work done to it...

[leorin]

Why, why, why, oh why would you delete her nips from the pic?

It took so long to get her to show em and now they're hiding em?

Thats like putting the Mona Lisa under a cloth cover!

Lets be honest, it didn't need any photochooping done to it in he first place!

[Poggy]

Originally Posted by leorin

Why, why, why, oh why would you delete her nips from the pic?

It took so long to get her to show em and now they're hiding em?

Thats like putting the Mona Lisa under a cloth cover!

Lets be honest, it didn't need any photochooping done to it in he first place!

It's a weekend thing with the Daily Star. They very rarely have a proper topless page 3 at the weekend. In fact for a few years they didn't even show a single nipple. It's only this year have they at odd times started too again.


Here is Lucy and Malene at Jeany Savage's studio while on a page 3 shoot...



....and a quick one of this weeks Truth About Women...

[leorin]

Originally Posted by Poggy

It's a weekend thing with the Daily Star. They very rarely have a proper topless page 3 at the weekend.

But its stil like drawing a beard and glasses on the Venus di Milo

[lucyspint]

Dear Poggy, have you an explanation for the photoshopping of the birthmarks on our favourite girl. I've noticed that Lucy has at least two. One on her neck and one near her boobs.



On Lucy's first topless shoot for NUTS they were there, but so far only on her calendar shoots their not edited. Sometimes I see the one on her neck, but the one near the boobs is always missing. Any suggestion, except for the obvious one that the editors think it would destroy the perfect look?

[Poggy]

Cleaned up picture...

Originally Posted by lucyspint

Dear Poggy, have you an explanation for the photoshopping of the birthmarks on our favourite girl. I've noticed that Lucy has at least two. One on her neck and one near her boobs.



On Lucy's first topless shoot for NUTS they were there, but so far only on her calendar shoots their not edited. Sometimes I see the one on her neck, but the one near the boobs is always missing. Any suggestion, except for the obvious one that the editors think it would destroy the perfect look?

I've have discussed this matter before. It is a interesting one for many.

So my own personal angle is I'm not a photoshop fan in this way. I like to see the natural beauty of a woman. Lucy has tons of that, so why mess with it? We all or most of us have moles. We constantly get them through life. I myself have got three new ones I've noticed over the last few years. I've even lost a couple on my fingers. Just worn away I guess. So I don't like to see them taken out.

In my full opinion photoshop used like this is wrong. Making a model perfect in their eyes without blemishes or giving them that perfect body. This all puts pressure on everyone. The model themselves to actually look like that. The everyday person to try to obtain this level.

I do believe this is why you get some women who just put on too much make up and stuff. As they try to cover up that mole or such. I'm not saying don't wear make up. Just that we've all seen them pictures or met people and thought....could have laid off the make up a bit. This is also because we don't all have that expert make up artist to do it or be able to photoshop the actual person.

So IMO....yes take out the unsightly bits in the background. That person or shadow that came into shot. Yes remove little things like red eye. But in no way mess with the natural beauty of the person.


There are some pictures that have the moles present. But as you say, not many. These are some topless, lingerie, bikini and mostly candids. You can find quite a few on this thread here

The only explanation I can give you though is.....The person or company that took the photo thinks she looks better that way.

[Poggy]

The front page and centre page poster from today's Daily Star...

[leorin]

Originally Posted by Poggy

The front page and centre page poster from today's Daily Star...

Speaking of photoshop, think there's been a bit of editing done behind that handle! God i'd kill for a look at the original!

[Delphi]

Hi Poggy, thanks a lot for the seemingly high quality Truth About Women pictures. It's excellent to see these images without the text.

Anyway, I've left you several PMs and was wondering if you have had a chance to check them. No rush but I thought since I haven't heard from you through PM I'd check with you through the forum. Thanks!